MIT students pull prank on conference

"In a victory for pranksters at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a bunch of computer-generated gibberish masquerading as an academic paper has been accepted at a scientific conference."

Check out examples I have generated below. We need to study to spot the Cyber-fakes these days, uhm?

Here is an abstract of a computer-generated paper with their engine:

Event-Driven, Semantic, Ambimorphic Modalities
CyBerlL
Abstract
Unified reliable theory have led to many compelling advances, including XML and Lamport clocks. After years of confirmed research into the Ethernet [2], we verify the exploration of kernels, which embodies the unproven principles of operating systems. In order to answer this question, we use probabilistic symmetries to verify that the acclaimed classical algorithm for the analysis of symmetric encryption is optimal.

You can also try the postmodern paper generator, here is an example:

Neotextual objectivism and the prestructural paradigm of discourse

John C. la Tournier
Department of Literature, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

1. Rushdie and the prestructural paradigm of discourse

"Class is part of the collapse of narrativity," says Foucault. However, the primary theme of Geoffrey's[1] model of cultural posttextual theory is a cultural whole. If neotextual objectivism holds, we have to choose between subdialectic objectivism and constructivist dematerialism.

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between creation and destruction. It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a prestructural paradigm of discourse that includes culture as a paradox. An abundance of narratives concerning neotextual objectivism may be revealed.

"Truth is dead," says Marx. In a sense, the example of the precultural paradigm of reality depicted in Rushdie's The Moor's Last Sigh emerges again in Satanic Verses, although in a more self-falsifying sense. Debord uses the term 'the prestructural paradigm of discourse' to denote the bridge between class and sexual identity.

It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a neotextual objectivism that includes consciousness as a totality. Foucault uses the term 'the prestructural paradigm of discourse' to denote the role of the participant as artist.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a neotextual objectivism that includes truth as a whole. Marx uses the term 'Debordist situation' to denote the genre of textual class.

In a sense, the characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is the common ground between culture and class. The subject is interpolated into a neotextual objectivism
that includes language as a paradox.

Thus, Baudrillard's essay on the subconceptual paradigm of consensus holds that sexual identity, ironically, has objective value. The subject is contextualised into a cultural posttextual theory that includes sexuality as a whole.